In a recent study published to the PNAS, Pierce and colleagues examines the consequences of a mutation to RING1, a protein coding gene that plays a role in “epigenetic regulation of gene expression” during neurodevelopment, in a case study of a 13-year-old girl with who displays neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and physical abnormalities (p. 1558).From genomic DNA comparison between the patient and her parents found the mutation was absent in both of the parents as well in a larger comparative sample of >120,000 exomes from a public database. Due to the lack of finding the a mutation of RING1 p.R95Q in both the parents and the database sample the authors identified mutation as a de novo mutation.
Once the authors identified the location of the mutation they compared the mutated RING1 p.R95Q to a wild type of RING1. RING1 in a non-abnormal in individual ubiquitylate histone H2A (e.g. it attaches ubiquitin which is a small protein to a targeted protein, in this case histone H2A). However, in the patient the researchers found RING1 p.R95Q failed to attach the protein together leading them to suggest the neurodevelopmental disorders the patient exhibited was caused by this mutation.
The importance of this paper allowed for researchers to get “a glimpse into the role of RING1 in human neuronal development” and the impact it has on causing psychological disorders (p. 1562).
There was a lot more to this paper, however, I am not familiar enough with what was done to explain what they did in my own words.
The paper can be read here.
Kristen's first PNAS post.
ReplyDeleteThe importance of this paper allowed for researchers to get “a glimpse into the role of RING1 in human neuronal development” and the impact it has on causing psychological disorders (p. 1562). best wedding ring
ReplyDelete